|
|
The Nature of Consciousness : The Structure of Reality: Theory of Everything Equation...
|
You are here:
Home > Science Books > Chaos Theory > Item
|
The Nature of Consciousness : The Structure of Reality: Theory of Everything Equation...
|
by Jerry Davidson Wheatley
Sales Rank : 125765
|
|
|
|
Hardcover: 800 pages
Publisher: Research Scientific Press May 2001
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0970316100
ISBN-13: 978-0970316103
Product Dimensions:
9.3 x 6.1 x 1.9 inches
Shipping Weight: 2.7 pounds
Product Description
This book describes how understanding the structure of reality leads to the Theory of Everything Equation. The equation unifies the forces of nature and enables the merging of relativity with quantum theory. The book explains the big bang theory and everything else.
Publisher Description
We published this book because it delivers on the promise of its title. It is not another book speculating on what scientists are trying to achieve. The book methodically explains the whole structure of reality and its functional levels. This understanding is then used to answer the big questions of science, philosophy and religion.
A more serious scientist than Jerry Wheatley can not be found. That is evident throughout the book. It is an overwhelming achievement of over thirty years of full time work. The book was released without fanfare.
Jerry began his scientific project with one assumption, namely that nature is uniform. Otherwise, he says, there is no sense in trying to understand anything. Other than that one assumption, he assumed nothing. There is an interesting twist to the second assumption. Years later while trying to understand the nature of spatial expansion from the Big Bang, Jerry recognized a problem. If space is defined by nothing, there is a problem in explaining the Big Bang as an expansion of space. Nothingness is everywhere -- it must extend indefinitely, even beyond the edge of universal expansion. Jerry says, "There is 'nothing' here, there is nothing there -- nothing is everywhere!" Space must be expanding into nothingness -- into itself. How can that be? The answer lies with the ultimate nature of space and the correct understanding of the cosmological singularity.
It is said "physics breaks down" as parameters narrow to the singularity. It means the mathematics breaks down, but it shouldn't and it doesn't. Jerry learned that the most basic elements of mathematics are insufficiently understood. He discovered this while trying to reconcile the expansion of space with the concept of nothingness. If space is nothing, how could it expand as though it were something? Specifically: was space static or dynamic (therefore nonstatic). How could it be both without contradiction? If it is not nothing, then it is not space. So, either there are two types of space or the ultimate nature of space was not properly understood.
When the accepted understanding of mathematics could not supply a noncontradictory answer to the space-nothingness problem, Jerry applied physics (particularly, the law of conservation) to math and discovered that the contemporary understanding of the basic elements of math was flawed. He began to understand why there are paradoxes in math and logic. The problem of space was similar to Russell's Paradox -- "The set of all sets which are not members of themselves." He realized that other paradoxes and Goedel's legacy resulted from insufficient understanding of the basic mathematical elements. Everyone assumed they understood how the basic elements such as zero, one, and infinity relate. But if these elements are not properly understood, then the physics to which these elements are applied will be misconstrued. And indeed, that is exactly what has happened. Appearances are deceiving. To obtain a deeper understanding of reality meant getting beyond apparent definitions.
Certainly, Jerry thought, a system can only be complete when it is also consistent. Yet it is acknowledged that a system is complete only if zero equals one (0 = 1). The system Jerry was considering is none other than the complete system denoted reality. After he deciphered the structure of reality and found no inconsistencies in reality's uniformity, he reasoned that perhaps the wrong concept of consistency was applied to a completed system because of insufficient understanding of the basic elements of mathematics. And that is what he found. He reasoned how to prove 0 = 1. Although the journey to truth was mindboggling, once he got to the ultimate truth, it was easy to understand. In fact, every child understands the ultimate equation.
|
|
|
|
