|
|
Climate Confusion: How Global Warming Hysteria Leads to Bad Science, Pandering Politicians...
|
You are here:
Home > Science Books > Atmospheric Science > Item
|
Climate Confusion: How Global Warming Hysteria Leads to Bad Science, Pandering Politicians...
|
by Roy Spencer
Sales Rank : 1936
|
|
|
|
Hardcover: 184 pages
Publisher: Encounter Books March 27, 2008
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1594032106
ISBN-13: 978-1594032103
Product Dimensions:
9.1 x 6.2 x 1 inches
Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces
Product Description
If you listen to the media, you would think that man-made environmental catastrophe was about to engulf the world and imperil civilization. From Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth to nightly jeremiads about CO2 emissions and carbon footprints, we are bombarded around the clock with alarmist reports that disasterous global warming is on the rise and that it's our fault. In Climate Confusion, noted climatologist Roy Spencer shows that fears about global warming are vastly exaggerated and are driven by politics, not truth. He shows that a global superstorm has already arrived-but it is a storm of hype and hysteria. Climate Confusion is a ground-breaking book that combines impeccable scientific authority with great wit and literary panache to expose the hysteria surrounding the myths of global warming and climate change. Spencer shows that the earth is far more resilient than exopessimists pretend and that increasing wealth and technology ingenuity, far from being the enemies of the environment, are the only means we possess to solve environmental problems as they arise.
From the Author
I wrote Climate Confusion for several reasons. In contrast to other works, I wanted it to be an entertaining and easily understood primer on how weather and climate works, showing why manmade global warming is unlikely to be a serious problem for humanity. Furthermore, I wanted to explore the political, philosophical, and religious underpinnings of beliefs in catastrophic global warming, helping the reader to better appreciate why scientific research in this area has become tainted and untrustworthy. Finally, and possibly most importantly, by using basic economic concepts I wanted to counter currently proposed policy "solutions" to global warming that will have devastating effects on the world's poor.
|
|
|
|
